ABSTRACT
Background: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely used in non-intubated COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. However, high-quality evidence to support its use in severe COVID-19 patients in an intensive care unit (ICU) is inadequate. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of APP for intubation requirements and other important outcomes in this patient population. Methods: We searched for potentially relevant articles in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception to May 25, 2022. Studies focusing on COVID-19 adults in ICU who received APP compared to controls were included. The primary outcome was the intubation requirement. Secondary outcomes were mortality, ICU stay, and adverse events. Study quality was independently assessed, and we also conducted subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias to explore the potential influence factors. Results: Ten randomized controlled trials with 1,686 patients were eligible. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate. Overall, the intubation rate was 35.2% in the included patients. The mean daily APP duration ranged from <6 to 9 h, with poor adherence to APP protocols. When pooling, APP significantly reduced intubation requirement (risk ratio [RR] 0.84; 95%CI, 0.74-0.95; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses confirmed the reduced intubation rates in patients who were older (≥60 years), obese, came from a high mortality risk population (>20%), received HFNC/NIV, had lower SpO2/FiO2 (<150 mmHg), or undergone longer duration of APP (≥8 h). However, APP showed no beneficial effect on mortality (RR 0.92 [95% CI 0.77-1.10; I 2 = 0%, P = 0.37] and length of ICU stay (mean difference = -0.58 days; 95% CI, -2.49 to 1.32; I 2 = 63%; P = 0.55). Conclusion: APP significantly reduced intubation requirements in ICU patients with COVID-19 pneumonia without affecting the outcomes of mortality and ICU stay. Further studies with better APP protocol adherence will be needed to define the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from this strategy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The new coronavirus-related pneumonia is causing a global pandemic without specific antiviral drug. Ribavirin has activity against extensive RNA and DNA viruses. We plan to systematically review the use of ribavirin in patients with coronavirus-related pneumonia and meta-analyze the data with updated studies. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure will be searched from 2002 to June 2021 without language restriction to identify randomized controlled trials. Subjects consist of patients with coronavirus-related pneumonia. Ribavirin of any dose or route will be compared with the control group of other medication, placebo, or no medication. The primary outcome is the hospital mortality. The secondary outcome includes the hospital length of stay, ventilator-free days in 28 days, median time from start of study treatment to negative nasopharyngeal swab, and adverse events. The Mantel-Haenszel method will be used for analysis of dichotomous data and the risk ratios will be reported with 95% confidence interval; the inverse-variance method will be used for continuous data and the mean differences will be reported. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be further performed. The funnel plots or Egger test will be used for detection of publication bias. The GRADE methodology will be used for summarizing the quality of evidence. The trial sequential analysis will be conducted to test whether the current meta-analysis is conclusive. RESULTS: The efficacy and safety of ribavirin for treatment of coronavirus-related pneumonia will be systematically reviewed and summarized. The forthcoming results of the ongoing studies focusing on ribavirin in patients with the 2019 noel coronavirus disease will also be included. CONCLUSION: The relevant studies will be summarized and advanced evidence will be provided. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020178900.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Research Design , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The 2019 novel coronavirus disease has caused a global pandemic with substantial morbidity and mortality. Chinese medicine has been extensively employed in the coronavirus-related pandemic in China. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine in treatment of coronavirus-related pneumonia with the updated results of relevant clinical trials. METHODS: Six electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, and SinoMed will be searched to identify randomized controlled trials up to May 2020. Patients diagnosed with coronavirus-related pneumonia including severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, and 2019 novel coronavirus disease and administrated with Chinese medicine will be included. The primary outcome is the all cause mortality at the longest follow up available. The second outcomes include the length of stay in hospital and intensive care units, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and adverse events. The pooled effects will be analyzed and reported as risk ratios for dichotomous data using the Mantel-Haenszel method or mean differences for continuous data using the inverse-variance method. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be performed to test the robustness of the results and to explore the potential sources of heterogeneities. The Egger test and/or funnel plots will be used for the examination of publication bias. The grades of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation methodology will be used to summarize the quality of evidence. The trial sequential analysis will be conducted to test whether the meta-analysis has a sufficient sample size after adjustment of the increased type I and II error risks. RESULTS: The evidence to date of Chinese medicine in treatment of coronavirus-related pneumonia will be systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed. CONCLUSION: The relevant studies will be summarized and further evidence will be provided.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020178879.